Here’s an Eye-Opening Factoid for Westerners Who Blame Reality TV Production Mark Burnett for Facilitating the Rise of Donald Trump By Creating An Image of Him A HIM AS A Master Businessman On The Reality Series “The Apprentice”: Vladimir Putin Had His Own Vehic His morphed from a TV producer to a key figure in everything from Russia’s Global Social-Media Misinformation Campaigns to Its Political Assassinations to the War in Ukraine.
Well, maybe he had no one just Like that, although it is the prerequisite for French director Olivier Assaya’s “The Wizard of the Kremlin”, a long and tight portrait of Russian politics over the last 35 years that premiered on Sunday at the Venice Film Festival. The film, based on the satirical novel with the same name by Giuliano da Empoli, announces in its opening frames that it is “an original fiction with artistic intent” and says that its characters are fictitious even when they admit that some of them are based on real people.
The character in the middle of the film seems to be based on the Russian politicians and former Putin adviser Vladislav Surkovin, but he is clearly fictional to become Vadim Baranov, a radical and reality producer in an instant. Baranov is a Zelig type that has been in the thick of any significant movement in Russian politics since the early 1990s.
While the character’s biography has more than a passing resemblance to surkovin – but played by Paul Dano, Baranov is something of an empty slate. If he is connected, ambitious and amoral, it is because Russia was constructed from these times by such men – but looking at Dano in action is to see a mastermind that seems premature calm, never even raises his voice. He is not an Allman as much as no man, and Dano plays him as an agent for chaos who never seems the least chaotic.
In a way, the whole point is how unlikely a mastermind this guy is. He speaks softly (and, like everyone else in the film, in easily accented English), and doughy the apartments in his functions act as a way to mask the schedule that takes place under them. Danos Baranov has the power with a whisper, but when the film goes on the whisper, a tribe of regrets and sorrow that never disappears, even if it is masked as strength. It is an unnecessary performance, which circles by Jude Law’s Putin as he leads the anger that runs the man consistently and lovingly called the “Tsar” rather than the president.
The film’s framing unit takes a while to cancel, but it has Jeffrey Wright as an American writer and expert on Russian geopolitics who visits Moscow and responds to an anonymous social media post who quotes Russian writer Yevgeny Zamyatin’s 1924-dystopic novel “We”, viewed a key on George or Wells Yevge “We”, viewed a key on George Orwells “1984. 1984. 1984. 1984. 1984. 1984. Wright’s character has recently published a newspaper story that pointed out how the mysterious Russian counselor Baranov had followed Zamyatin’s plan to establish a totalitarian state. How?
The anonymous person who called him turns out to be Baranov, of course and breaks his long self -imposed exile to essentially tell his story to the American reporter, who disappears quite a lot for everyone except the book’s book. The story begins with the fall of the Soviet Union and the emergence of the wild Russian version of capitalism in the early 1990s, which turned the country into a cheating experiment that did not go well.
Analyzes collaborate the dizzy atmosphere for its film style; The film’s opening distance is dense and hectic, a barrier of arguments about capitalism, communism and the Russian mind. The conversation comes quickly and furiously, rarely stops or even slow down to give the viewers a foothold. Everyone is in a hurry to create a new Russia, including the artistic revolutionary students who attract Baranov, a future avant -Garde theater director.
Of course, priorities change, and Baranov takes a job that produces television with the goal of mixing game programs and politics. It somehow puts him in a reluctant politician and former KGB official named Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, who rejects them by saying: “Why I? I am an official.” But it turns out that the official has ambitions and is willing to let the TV producer help him achieve them, as long as it remains clear that he calls the shots … and that he will, by the way, want to invade Tjetchnia sometime.
“The Crember’s magician dives into an exploration of the different ways to win and retain power and of the Russian nation’s soul. At one point Putin mumbles that while he is far ahead in the vote against his political opponents, he is not as popular as Stalin even today.
“People think Stalin is popular despite the murders,” he explains to Baranov. “Stalin is popular because by the murders. “
You can say that the film is a portrait of evil, but it is about process more than ideology; It is a nut-and-bolt portrait of how you construct evil. As a person who always seems to be a few steps ahead of Baranov (which may be the reason why he falls in love with her), Alicia Vikander is a valuable voice of morality, or at least a compromised version of morality, in a movie where most characters are much more concerned about how they can do something than if they are to do so.
Read all our Venice Film Festival coverage here.
The film’s pace slows down after its first hour, but the ideas remain dense and relentless. For a satire, there is not much ease here. Instead, with every new injustice in the Putin regime, Baranov finds a way to motivate it and make the regime more effective. When the students lead a rebellion in Ukraine, Baranov Pro-Russian cyclist groups, hooligans, communists, skinheads and religious fanatics recruit; When the government supports a warehouse full of computer’s Whiz children who make ways to undermine voices from the West and get their own message, Baranov tricking and saying that they forget to publish about politics and concentrate on sowing confusion and conspiracy theories to create mistrust and chaos.
“The Americans wrote the algorithm,” he says. “We use it better than them.”
The hours with strategy and maneuvering make a massive and sometimes exhausting experience, but there really is an relevance to a story about Putin … and to a story about a powerful head of state who gets a boost from a reality TV producer.
And mostly, “The Wizard of the Kremlin” is a high, bold film held together by the silent performance in the center. Dano always lets us see how much effort Baranov puts out to keep himself in check, even though the movie around him is more in the camp “Go Big or Go Home”.
