With her Sophomore elements “Dead lover“Director and co -author Grace Glowicki uses a minimalist approach to a familiar, high -concept premise. The film follows a lonely grave (Also Glowicki) that uses experimental science to bring his goofy lovers to life again after he was killed at sea. On the paper, “Dead Lover” partially evokes the loved “Frankenstein” adaptation from 1931, but since Glowicki recorded the film entirely on a Toronto sound scene, it reminds more of an experimental theater production than a low-budget horror movie of ant standard.
The background in the studio requires almost abundant creativity from Glowicki’s little actor and crew, as “Dead Lover” shows in spades. Film photographer Rhayne Vermette often illustrates actors so that they bathe in the dark, which reproduces the film’s varied environments, from a cemetery to the open water, suggestive playgrounds, with just stage pictures to fill in a handful of void. This staginess not only provides a lively quality to the production, but also focuses the audience’s attention on both the story and its construction. “Dead Lover” understands that deliberate artificiality, when used properly, can be as engrossing as the most expensive illusion.
Likewise, Glowicki and her team use different practical elements – props, costumes, makeup, prostheses, visual effects in the camera – to contribute to (O) reality of “dead lover”. The film’s sparse, handmade 16 mm aesthetics, which visually resembles influences from early German expressionism to works by The guy MaddinPrimarily sells the film’s peculiar amazingness, despite its derived character.
Unfortunately, the inspired production serves above all performances and stories that are in a comic register that can vary between mileage. “Dead Lover” treats the tomb’s search for love, hindered by her dirty clothes and a lingering equal tank, with a certain gravity, but her relatable desires are deliberate with Glowicki’s exaggerated performance. She plays the tomb excavator as a horny version of the screaming housewife caricature that the Monty Python squad would play in the “Flying Circus” sketches. Her exaggerated Cockney accent who speaks in melodramatic dialogue drives much of the comedy in her appearance, which ultimately becomes thin during the film’s short playing time.
The four people, with all except Glowicki who play several roles, deliver similar histionic conceptions such as gossip, sailors, priests and unholy scientific creations. (Only the tomb excavator’s Posh Dandy lover, played by co-author Ben Petrie, and Lowen Morrow’s turn as an opium-filled widower, exhibits a smaller vocal restraint.) Everyone, especially Glowicki, exhibits some fearless physicality, the variety that naturally derives from drama departments around the world. The whole actor probably deserves some recognition because they “bind to the bit”, so to speak. The problem, of course, is that the piece itself is stuck in a gear. Even as the complicated action develops, the characters and performances remain frustrating static. Only Glowicki sometimes modulates his acting, especially in the other half of the film. When she does, her obvious talent shines through.
The film’s self -consciously struggled tone doesn’t matter much. In its worst moments, “Dead Lover” feels like it is trying to convert a cult film. What this means, however, is a lot of deliberate Hammy Line deliveries and over -affected documents. When it does not go through silly facial expressions or “cooked” sex scenes, it leans towards rough, exploitation-like effects or “Benny Hill”-like high-speed movements. “Dead Lover” performs best when writing encompasses word play, or at least a humorous phrase. (“Fetid Stank” and “Teste Renewal” are good for a laugh.) The epistolic part of the film, where the smooth lover sends letters to the tomb excavator about his trip to an experimental fertility clinic, is a nice change of pace for a movie that constantly distorts crazy, for good and bad.
Ironically, whenever “Dead Lover” shows its romantic side, it reveals a tenderness that feels more potent than its comic instincts. It is clear that Glowicki and Company do not see the tomb’s amorous longing as a joke, even though the character consistently behaves as such. It is mildly heartwarming when the lover frees to the tomb excavator and accepts her overwhelmingly nasty smell as an element of her beauty, even though it is under false pre -markers. (After all, empty promises can still be meaningful at the moment.) It is comparatively tragic when the lover’s Caddish view comes out. Glowicki often returns to the influencing image of an eerie moonlight night, where anxiety and glow can potentially go hand in hand, to convey the depth of the tomb’s loneliness. At least the “dead lover” understands the feeling of getting a brief taste of something you have wanted for a long time and how its absence can drive someone to madness.
Although the pure imagination that is embedded in the production of “Dead Lover” is really admirable, its long -standing, forced madness unfortunately impairs everything it touches. That being said, there are definitely people who will add to this type of movie as a duck to the water. It is important for them to see it, care for it and spread the word to like -minded weirdness everywhere.
Rating: C+
“Dead Lover” premiered in 2025 Sundance Film festival. It is currently seeking American distribution with Yellow Veil Pictures that manages its sales.
Want to keep you up to date on IndieWire’s movie Reviews And critical thoughts? Subscribe here To our newly launched newsletter, in review by David Ehrlich, where our chief film critic and chief review editor brings together the best new reviews and streaming elections together with some exclusive thoughts – all only available to subscribers.
