Do we have to define a “simp” correctly? For them (tour enough?) Not being present in the online spaces where this is usually parlance, it refers to someone who gives too flattering to an object of their affection or romantic endeavor, with little or no reciprocity. Somewhere more benign on this internet hose spectrum than the dreaded “incel”, A SIMP is really not a threat or a great inconvenience to “simp-ed”, and a pity in addition to cautious appreciation is the typical reaction from observers. Unique to the concept, Simping is abundant as well as within private interactions: Click on the answers during a cult-is-celebrity tweet, and mine, you will see swimming.
Formalist Festival Documentary has a new superstar and His username is “Cleaning Simp Paul.” Denis side, The productive writer behind “Paul,” has really talked about the intelligence of his subject and relative self -awareness; From this we can see Pause Self develops this epithelium with a wink, perhaps by the emoji variety. His rolls, replicated in its entirety in the congregation, expresses it quite eloquently: this is a shy, overweight québecois in the early thirties whose “bit” cleans the houses to eclectic strangers for no repayment and great self -fulfillment, all for the purpose of relieving relieve to relieve the houses his devastating social anxiety. Those from the peanut gallery that identify adopted “simps” would never light on this exact interpretation of the term.
But Côté, an influential French-Canadian fixture in the Art festival Circuit, bury something in its exhibition. Keep in mind that he’s breaking opens for a few minutes, as Paul’s deceitfully happy way makes this seem to be a fun, eccentric news, a more crafted form of Mr. Beast-type “lol random” rolling content. Still, we realize that his clientele is often-tated up dominatics from Montréal’s famous kink scene, and these interactions meet a very special need and fetish for Paul, in an environment credited to evaluate consent and the playful exploration of boundaries. To Côté and editor Terence Chotard’s credit, it is a seamless foreground of new information, rather than a scrubbing handset, to the transition from him as scrubs a sink, to one of his clients using his upper body as a footstool.
Côté makes documentaries where viewers can productively investigate questions about authenticity and provenance, and fiction features that are usually composed in a naked, very elegant, observation style. Nevertheless, “Paul” fits happily into the broader non-fiction trunk where a director is lit on a charismatic and often settled offbeat individual-which also makes it more consumable for a wider audience than his previous works. But a gaping pot the smaller deft of these films court – the introduction of condescending judgment and an invitation to mock – is also resident. Côte observes Paul without a doubt to find a personal equilibrium in this commitment, but leaves it for ourselves to think about the strange triangulation of unwanted household chores, deep internet culture and BDSM.
Assessing all the information that the film gives us again, an eye -catching absence is some reference to the autistic spectrum. Paul honestly speaks near the beginning of his debilitating anxiety, depression and the resulting social isolation he suffers; In fact, the audience may be waved to inform him informally. A slicing of deeper background arrives when he describes his twenties as a complete depreciation, first release from college and then ashamed to go out or interact with someone. Yet beyond being a sex positive filmIt is just and gratefully a positive way: with the gamified goals that Paul puts himself by supporters to achieve, and then, weight to shed, we can observe an idiosyncratic, personal regime of self -improvement that can work.
The boundaries between exposure and integrity also clearly fascinate Côté. Paul is just one of the thousands of secluded and lonely young people who generate a “second life” in the digital area, offered a tabula rage for a new way of becoming (the young man’s obvious visual story knowledge, from his addictive and comic timing strow Reels, also poses him as a relative spirit to the director). Nevertheless, much more provocative is how this crosses the affiliated party: a sex worker’s need to market, advertise and design themselves for consumption.
It is also where the side of Côté that reveals to put meat and furious activities on unscathed display reveals themselves, although they gratefully recognize convincing excavations against his last Berlinale premiere, “that kind of summer”, to dominate its titilored male look. The more light whipping, gimp masks and suggestive food games look we-and in how the much more boring housework is emphasized we notice “Paul” as a piece of Trojan horse pure eroticism, partly satisfy the more niche taste of those who love it , but acts as a documentary and anthropological fascination for the rest of us.
To float around the prosodin of “Simp” is the word “sub” – Paul is really a proud sub, because we gradually understand that his content is not only happy roller food, but that he also happily exhibits his sexual preference as an “out” kink -The enthusiast, brilliant visibility on himself and perhaps others as he comes when the 2020s continue. It’s just so wonderful Québécois and Alt-Montréal: Empowerment of Letting Your Freak Flag Fly on full mast.
Rating: B+
“Paul” premiered at 2025 Berlin International Film Festival. It is currently seeking US distribution.
Want to keep you updated on IndieWire’s movie Reviews And critical thoughts? Subscribe here To our recently launched newsletter, in review by David Ehrlich, where our main film critic and Head Review’s editor rounds off the best new reviews and streaming choices along with some exclusive Musings – all only available for subscribers.
